1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
Nothing really stood out for me this week but it was nice to brush up on different funding formats that a business could undergo. As I launched my website a few weeks ago and as we expand, it will be important that I be able to secure funding to expand on our interests.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
Nothing was really confusing about the reading for me this week, just making sure that I can distinguish from all the different types of funding that exist.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
The first question I would ask the author is if he had a company, what format (LLC, PLLC, 501(c)3 non profit, etc.) would he choose to utilize and would he take it public. I think that might highlight any bias that he may have had in writing the text. I would also ask how might he go about the process of securing funding.
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
I did not disagree with anything the author wrote, because the process of listing how business can receive funding or the ways they can go public are pretty subjective.